https://static.mk.ru/upload/entities/2020/07/24/13/articles/detailPicture/69/55/0f/d4/727db0dcde8d637e98c7191ea0a63c99.jpg

on Friday, lawyer Michael Ephraim, announced that the civil wife of the deceased in an accident the driver of Sergey Zakharov has submitted an application to the court for investigation. And added – the woman has no chance to be recognized as the victim.

Irina sterkhova, who lived with the victims for more than twenty years, commented on his decision.

– the Decision of the investigation that I can’t be the victim, we have long appealed. The consideration was appointed on July 31. But it makes no sense, because it is essentially Ephraim will be considered on July 29, – says Irina sterhova. – On Thursday I filed in the Presnensky district court court to recognize me the victim. The justification put relevant documents. As I understand it, my motion should be considered in that day will be the consideration of the merits, that is on 29 July. In any case, the judge must make a decision. Will not in our favor, we will go to complain to the city court. If I’m wrong, let me explain from the point of view of the law, why. And I wonder why our complaints about it are still not considered neither Prosecutor’s office nor the city Prosecutor’s office. Responses from these departments, I have not received.

Lawyer Ephraim is on his own – you can’t be a victim, because it was not officially formalized marriage.

– Relatively Pashayeva, his mocking my actions do not do him credit as a man, if he is trying to hurt the woman. Well, what is he a lawyer will show the court verdict. For some reason I think a lot of it then you will be disappointed.

the lawyer of the civil wife of the victim Vadim Nikulin commented: “We are his position are going to defend to the last. We will do everything possible to Sterhova recognized the victim because we think this is her right and you have a legitimate reason. Our arguments stated in complaints, no one has denied. The behavior and statements Pashayeva against Sterkhovoe and its position on the case I have no right to discuss, and I do not think it is worthy.”