Offsidereglen do not promote offensive football enough, and therefore will lovorgan look at how it can be changed.
Since the introduction of the VAR system has the social media been the stage for massive frustration from the fans, who have seen scores be canceled WAS due to a centimetre offside or less.
A lock of hair, a bursitis or a point has been too far advanced, and so the goal was cancelled.
But now, there is perhaps a view that offsidereglen needs to be changed. WERE not disappear, but part of the frustration might be eliminated.
The International Football Association Board (Ifab), which manages the fodboldlovene, held on Tuesday his 134. general assembly to discuss the development of the fodboldspillet and its rules.
Here was the current offsideregler discussed, and the Ifab are ready to analyze them further to find out for an adjustment.
– the Members were agreed that the basic philosophy behind the offside must support a desire to encourage offensive football and scoring in the minutes of the meeting.
– Therefore, it was agreed that law no. 11 (offside, red.) should be analysed and reviewed with a view to make suggestions for changes, which reflect this philosophy.
As the law reads today, is an attacking player offside if a playable part of the body is closer to the opponent’s goal than two of the defending team’s players (which one will usually be the goalkeeper, ed.).
In practice it will say that only the arms can not be in the offide position, since the rest of the body may be used to play ball with.
In the course of the current season has seen a few centimeters of a knee or a point result in a canceled score, because the VAR system detected the violation.
Offsidereglen has been adjusted through time, and it is probably one of the causes of major frustration, as it can create with both fans and players.
How a new adjustment of the rule would come to to sounds, when the in the higher the degree must benefit the attacking team, should the time display.
An outright rule change in the area has probably still a bit of a long wait, since the Ifab first started with the analysis.
At the meeting on Tuesday were other rules, however, adopted.
for Example, there will no longer be judged omspark on a penalty kick, if the ball goes over or hits the post, even if the keeper goes early. Only if it is deemed that the keeper was directly culpable in the missed kicks.
in Addition, it should not cost a yellow card, if a player tries to stop a promising attack for the opponent if the referee allows play to continue or allow a free-kick taken quickly to continue the attack.
the Judge is expected also to review the decisions or lack of same, in the case where there is a subjective assessment and the use of WAS.
And finally, it has been clarified how the relatively new rule should be interpreted, when it is about an attacking team can not score, “immediately after” to one of the team’s players have accidentally had a hand on the ball.