Such clarification was made during a special webinar, “the Regime of non-working paid days: what to do to the employer?”, organized by the Institute of legislation and comparative law under the government of Russia. In addition, the Institute is the leading government expert institution on legal matters.
Mode in the remote mode people are given differently. Some are tired to work hard at home, did you miss the labor collective and dream to go to the office. Others – and a lot of them – like to work in Slippers, they are dreaming that is not ended.
Now mode days removed, but in many regions of the preserved limitations. So while for many remote workers, nothing has changed. However, one unnerving hour, when the chief will call and say “come, I want you to see” closer. Whether the employee has the right to say “no, I’d rather work from home”? Alas, no.
“the employee has no reason not to go in this case to work,” – said a leading researcher of the Department of labour law and social security of the Institute of legislation and comparative law under the government of Russia Tatyana Korshunova. She moderated a webinar on the “Mode of paid nonworking days: what employer?”.
as soon As the company’s management will issue the order to return to the normal mode of operation, all employees are required to obey. However, the employee has the right to request to leave it on remotely. But the last word here for rabotodatelem. If the boss and employee are comfortable, they can leave things as they are. Thus experts suggest to sign an additional agreement to allow the person to work remotely. This document will protect the employee if his superiors will change the mood, no one can accuse a man of truancy, they say, sat at home on his own.
in addition, Tatiana Korshunova advises to introduce some form of accountability for employees to work remotely. Otherwise, the employer may claim a tax inspection, they say what you pay the employee? According to her, there is already sufficient judicial practice, when the working time the person was not read, and the documents submitted to the social insurance Fund, were rejected. To the supervising authorities talked to employers, they say, a person could not you have to work four hours a day, as he is listed in two places and just not physically able to break. So in the case of remote work. Questions may arise: why time counts as working, whether the person has fulfilled the work for which he was paid? Or wages in fact paid to a dead soul?
Also the employee at the remote work mozhno to punish some disciplinary violations.
