https://cdnimg.rg.ru/img/content/190/03/03/RIAN_5507122.HR.ru_d_850.jpg

– As the author of the term “nationalization of the elites” can say that this is still some process, he said. – What rules of national law raised in the Constitution, that’s fine, but I would say about the security of the state and the establishment of certain rules of the game. The satisfaction of public demand and public demands to the government: that it should be open and fair, officials have to work and live in Russia and to link their future and their children’s future in this country. There should be their money, home, etc.

In a society long there is an understanding that the process of “nationalization of the elite” long-running and yielding results, he said:

– When we adopted these amendments and the Federal laws that have been in place for more than 5 years, the society has been the understanding that this process is that it is producing results. For several years officials are prohibited from having any assets abroad. But when we talk about the Constitution, it is taken for a longer period than those laws. The Constitution for decades. When we say that these rules on public servants shall be made in the Constitution, we’re talking about something else here and the security of the state, and public demand for quality power, as it needs to run and in whose interests to act.

As noted by the analyst, it was amended, and in particular article 67 in the Constitution will help to prevent the rewriting of history and distortion of the role of Russia in the historical process:

– If we are talking about rewriting history in Russia, that is one thing. But we face challenges of a different order.If we are talking about historical memory, it is extremely important to understand. One great writer said that a nation that knows its past, confused in the present and will find its way into the future. This is a very important rule, which is needed for the organization of our domestic space.

But rewriting history is what they do from the outside. Other countries are differently it is interpreted and in this case, the amendment will not prevent them in any way. We can’t prevent, for example, the authors of the United States, Germany, Poland to present their version of history.

Recall that a nationwide vote on amendments to the Constitution will be held on 1 July.