the founder of the party “New people” Alexey Nechaev has commented on the results of the recently completed session of the lower house of Parliament and analyzed the report of Prime Minister Mikhail mishustina. According to Nechayev, the state Duma and the Prime Minister spoke different languages.
“Mishustin has always been consistent in their actions. When he was the chief tax specialist of the country, when it and the increased taxes and began to gather more rigidly, – says Alexey Nechaev. Now Mishustin said about the digital transformation of all spheres of society. On the one hand, digitalisation is the modern trend, the demand of time. On the other hand, digitalization can lead to what state in life of each person will become too much. It so much and will be even more.”
Speaking about the reaction of parliamentarians on the report of the Prime Minister, Alexey Nechaev has noticed that the parliamentary party of the Prime Minister is not heard. In the speeches of the leaders of the faction it was possible to see only a General inquiry of the state Duma on stable conservatism. Reaction to upcoming innovations followed.
“the Prime Minister made it clear to MPs that it’s time for serious changes. To change from old bus to new one. The faction leaders talked about how best to change seats in the old bus. In fact, they were shuffling the same deck of questions that 10, 20 years ago,” said Nechaev.
According to the founder of the party “New people”, if earlier, the mouthpiece of stability was made by “United Russia”, but now it’s even more talk of the Communist party and LDPR. This once again emphasizes that in the state Duma actually meets one party, party rents, party stability. The whole debate in the state Duma does not reflect public demand for a parliamentary party of a different type – modern party, the party for progress and development.
“the leaders of the Communists and the liberal Democrats are concerned, how to save and share, but not how to create and develop a new, – said Alexey Nechaev. – Concerned about their own issues. Speaking of helping people, businesses, they still offer to give them the fish, not the bait. They do not propose to create an environment in which this business could develop. The Communist party, for example, yearn for the system of the state planning Commission. Although private management has proven to be a benefit to the state in many large projects. And that is something to aspire to in many areas of our lives.”
