officials, the police and the superintendent are required to monitor the apartment of a convicted person, while he is serving his sentence. With this clarification was made by the constitutional court. The protection of property of convicts from thieves and “black realtors” will state.
the lawsuit was the complaint of administration of Murmansk. The officials did not understand how to execute the decision of the local court, which ordered to protect the housing of the convicted person to imprisonment of the man. At first the issue seemed simple: the employee of the municipality together with the district, an employee of the management company and the neighbor accused in the stairwell sealed off the apartment and signed all the necessary acts. But then the confusion began. None of those present did not want to take on the extra burden and inspected regularly, not disrupted if the seal on the door lock. Moreover, someone would need to follow to the apartment in the absence of the owner no one cranked fraudulent transactions. Officials and police tried to give this thankless job to the superintendent. The utility refused. Then the city administration filed a petition in the local court with a request to explain who and how to follow the “single,” apartment. But the judge found that here and so everything is clear, and even refused to take a statement. However, the constitutional court decided that in a situation to understand really easy. As stated in the decision of the constitutional court, rule on the protection of housing the convicted person during the period of his stay in the colony is enshrined in article 313 of the criminal procedure code. But prescribed it is vague, without details. The law says only that the court together with the verdict and makes a ruling on measures for protection of the unsupervised property of the accused. What are these measures and who have to do the puzzle. To resolve the ambiguity, the high court admitted the disputed article of the CCP was unconstitutional. Now the law officials will have to rewrite. And while they did not adhere to should be clarification of the decisions of the COP. So, seal the apartment and periodically check the seal is intact and locks are the police or local administration. To impose a ban on registration in premises of any citizen without the consent of the owner, also must the internal Affairs bodies. The prohibition of real estate transactions, while the owner is serving time, is the responsibility of the territorial departments of Rosreestr. Check the normal condition of the housing – care of the local authority.
