The Ukrainian law enforcement authorities have noticeably intensified their anti-corruption activities. At the beginning of February there were sensational searches and dismissals.

The Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) reports that it searched the house of the Ukrainian oligarch Ihor Kolomoiskyj in connection with the embezzlement of 40 billion hryvnia (about 980 million euros today) by the former management of the largest Ukrainian oil and gas producer Ukrnafta and the pipeline operator Ukrtransnafta. Kolomoiskyj held shares in the two semi-state companies, which were nationalized under martial law last November.

In addition, the State Bureau of Investigation (DBR) reported that a former energy and coal industry minister was under suspicion. He is accused of concluding contracts in favor of companies connected to the oligarch Dmytro Firtash, who has been living in Austria for years. As a result, the state is said to have incurred losses of 1.5 billion hryvnia (today around 35 million euros). According to Ukrainian media, it is said to be Ihor Nasalyk.

In addition, the SBU and DBR conducted searches at former Interior Minister Arsen Avakov. As he himself reported, the measure was carried out in connection with investigations into the cause of the helicopter crash in Brovary near Kyiv, in which the Interior Ministry leadership was killed in mid-January. The investigators were primarily interested in the contracts for the purchase of Airbus H225 helicopters by the Ministry of the Interior.

According to reports, there were also searches of representatives of Kiev construction companies, which are controlled by a member of the Ukrainian parliament from the now banned pro-Russian party “Opposition Platform – For Life”. At the same time, the DBR carried out searches at the head of the capital’s tax office. Officials said they had uncovered millions of dollars in fraud there.

There were also searches of former Defense Ministry officials. The Attorney General’s Office also announced that a department head of the ministry is suspected of embezzling particularly large amounts of money and forgery.

A former deputy secretary of defense is also under suspicion. He is said to have hindered the work of the Ukrainian armed forces and other military units in a particularly difficult time. According to the investigation, the suspect allegedly lobbied for contracts to supply the military with food at inflated prices and to purchase bulletproof vests, helmets, clothing and other low-quality items.

While investigators conducted searches, the government dismissed almost all of the Ukrainian Customs leadership and a number of other agencies. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said in a speech that he was satisfied with the investigators’ work. “Unfortunately, in some areas, the only way to guarantee legitimacy is to change leadership simultaneously with the implementation of institutional changes,” the head of state stressed.

Volodymyr Fesenko, a political scientist and head of the “Penta” center for political research, believes that the presidential office is killing two birds with one stone by demonstrating the fight against corruption.

“It was a large-scale anti-corruption demonstration. That was no coincidence in the run-up to the Ukraine-EU summit on February 3 in Kyiv. Visible anti-corruption results are one of the criteria for evaluating Ukraine’s European integration,” says Fesenko. He believes that with these measures the President is also responding to the widespread public desire for corrupt top officials to be punished.

Fesenko advises looking closely at which structures carried out the searches: the Security Service of Ukraine, the State Investigation Bureau and the Bureau of Economic Security, which is under the supervision of the Prosecutor General’s Office. “These are the structures that actively work with the Office of the President, although the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (SAP), which are more independent, should be active in matters of corruption,” he said Expert.

The head of the anti-corruption organization StateWatch, Oleksandr Lemenov, also believes that the searches should demonstrate that corruption is being fought in Ukraine. However, these are not really cases that would ultimately lead to convictions.

Mykola Havronyuk from Ukraine’s Center for Political and Legal Reform believes that when searches are carried out and people are suspected, it is a good sign. “In order to investigate effectively, investigators have to collect evidence of illegal activities for a long time and document everything. It is impossible to order all this for a specific day, for example, in the run-up to a summit meeting,” emphasizes the anti-corruption policy expert.

With Ukraine’s survival in the war with Russia now at stake, Havronyuk believes it would be an unwise and dangerous move for the country’s political leadership to undermine the trust of international partners with a sham fight against corruption. The expert hopes that President Volodymyr Zelensky will not risk something like this in the first place.

Adaptation from the Ukrainian: Markian Ostapchuk

Author: Lilia Rzheutska

The Russian aviation industry also sees advantages in the sanctions. Switching to planes like the Tupolev Tu-214 promotes your own skills. Outside of Russia, however, the model is considered technologically outdated.

Russia is said to be sending “Marker” robots to Ukraine to destroy western main battle tanks there. The “killer robots” are already on their way – but only four so far. The “marker” can be equipped with various weapon systems. But whether that will benefit the Russians is questionable.

The original of this post “Is Kyiv really fighting corruption – or is it all just for show?” comes from Deutsche Welle.