This article is over two days old and may contain outdated advice from the authorities regarding the koronasmitten.

Keep yourself updated in The overview, or through the FHIs website.

Closer to 770.000 people in the world have been shown koronasmitte, and the number of the dead has on Monday passed 36.000.

In Norway, 4276 people been shown koronasmitte, show the latest figures from the Norwegian institute of public health (FHI). It is 124 more than in the same time on Sunday.

the Lowest number of infected has North Norway. Scattered settlement and strict, local karantenetiltak is regarded as the causes.

Sunday evening had 146 people in Troms and Finnmark had proven infection, while the number for the Nordland was 48.

a Few cases in Norway

Professor Ørjan Olsvik at the UNIVERSITY, one of the country’s foremost authorities on epidemics and viral diseases.

Photo: Tonje Hareland / NRK

Professor Ørjan Olsvik at the Norwegian arctic university in Tromsø is one of Norway’s foremost experts on viruses and epidemics.

He tells of 0,81 per 1000 people are infected in Norway.

In Oslo, there are twice as many with 1,61, and in the Creek 1,97. Look at the Troms and Finnmark, it is 0,58, that is, a third of Oslo. Nordland has the most superb numbers with only 0,2 suffering per 1000. Eight times less suffering than in Oslo.

In total, 26 deaths reported to FHI. In addition, it is reported that six deaths in the course of Monday. The dead are aged 62 to 95 years of age.

Read also: Warns against lowering the shoulders after koronatall Defender “søringkarantene”

Northern municipalities was quickly out to introduce their own karanteneregler. Several places had to all the visitors from the southern region are automatically quarantined for 14 days.

on Monday, stated a number of municipalities in the north that they will continue with the so-called “søringkarantenen”, despite the fact that the government does not believe there is a need for local karanteneregler.

Professor Ørjan Olsvik supports well on the way to the municipalities.

– The low smittetallene in the north shows that the mayors do have something for themselves. But “søringkarantenen” will only work for a while, according to Olsvik.

In the long term it will not be possible to implement as strict karantenebestemmelser especially consistent, he believes.

– When smittetallene in the south and the north begin to look like each other, it will say that it is the same smitterate in the north as Oslo and the Bay, it has no purpose with søringkarantene, ” he says.

Read also: Denmark can facilitate the on koronatiltak after easter Still early

Senior Gunnveig Grødeland works both immunology and vaksinologi. She thinks it probably is too early to see the effect of the measures in the north.

Photo: Kristin Ellefsen / Kristin Ellefsen/UiO

Senior Gunnveig Grødeland, University of Oslo, believes it still needs to go some time before one can measure the effect of the northern karantenereglene.

Incubation period is two weeks and it is a little early to see the effect now. After three-four weeks, you should be able to see it.

Tromsø kommune tightened their rules 14. march. Bodø municipality followed suit three days later.

Grødeland working both with immunology and vaksinologi. She believes mørketallene is something that is important for the karanteneregler to work as desired.

– It depends on how many are infected without knowing it. The lower the number is, the less effect have the measures.

If you know that you have control of your infection, it is not necessary with greater control.

She don’t disagree that a form of “søringkarantene” can be useful, but that it will vary.

– I think it depends. I see there are municipalities that have closed down without infection in the county. It looks I little purpose. The more infection there is, the more effect such measures.

Here closed the schools five days before the rest of the Uk – warns against to modify the requirements Slows infection

In the vesterålskommunen Hadsel is it detected three infected so far. One of these is had.

We follow the FHI recommendations. In phase one of an epidemic is it an effective and useful measures to reduce the travelers from certain areas, ” says kommuneoverlege Ingebjørn Bleidvin.

Kommuneoverlege Ingebjørn Bleidvin in Hadsel in Vesterålen are stuck in that they follow FHIs own recommendations.

Photo: Private

When the municipality comes in phase two, he is clear that the measure is no longer considered useful and effective.

But when it is he unsure of. He has in fact missed earlier and thought really Hadsel should be in phase two already.

It seems as if the government and FHI hit pretty good with the measures. It has really managed to curb smittespredningen. It is at the same time no point to have an illusion that it is not going.

we Come through easter and still are in phase one, I will be surprised.

He emphasizes at the same time that the measures are not about to stop infection, but to slow it.

– the Idea of the measures and actions which the local is not to never get it and isolate us until it is gone over. It is to buy us time.

What exactly is the difference in the measures Norway and Sweden have adopted to combat koronaviruset? You need javascript to see the video.

What is really the difference in the measures Norway and Sweden have adopted to combat koronaviruset?

More about koronaviruset StatusRåd and infoSiste nyttSpør NRK