the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly handed down a landmark decision against the President of the country. That is, the judge ruled that Nixon must provide the public with audio recordings of all conversations in the oval office – that ended with the resignation of the President. The Supreme court has rejected the petition of Clinton not to participate in the investigation of Monica Lewinsky – then just party loyalty saved the President from prison. And now the Supreme court demanded that trump submit financial documents to the prosecutors. Trump the end or not so simple – try to understand.
“Trump have to disclose all your secrets”, “This is a resounding defeat of the President”, “Seven judges out of nine did not support the President”, “Both appointees trump voted against it”, “I’m Sorry, Donald, this is the end, you left even your supporters”.
So said the experts and readers are likely powering sympathy for the Democratic party, the news that the Supreme court has allowed prosecutors to review the financial report of the US President.
of Course, it is unlikely that the White house is happy that some of his documents will be forwarded to the state prosecutors.
However, it should be considered that the decision on the provision of documentation, adopted by an overwhelming majority of judges, really poses a serious threat to trump.
the Answer to this question is harder than it sounds, because, as you know, the devil is in the details.
so, really, the Supreme court approved the claim of the district attorney of Manhattan Cyrus Vance Jr., who demanded from the President to demonstrate its financial expenses. Theoretically, Vance Jr. is investigating the case of pornoaktrisa Stormy Daniels, which the President supposedly had been silenced.
In reality, a detailed analysis is likely to undergo, each suspicious financial transaction of the President Cyrus Vance Jr. is a registered supporter of the Democratic party.
the Decision to transfer Prosecutor reports trump took 7 of the 9 judges. It was voted not only the four traditionally liberal judges, but three conservatives.
the President of the court is a moderate conservative John Roberts was motivated by that decision the famous precedent that happened over 200 years ago. Then the legendary chief justice John Marshall ruled that the current President (no less than the legendary Thomas Jefferson) may be called to court summons. Since the decision of Marshall remained immutable: it reflects the principle that even the current President can not be above the law.
In General, for anybody not a surprise that in this case the court decides in the spirit of this principle. That is why both the appointee trump and Brett Kavanagh, and Neil Gorsuch votedand for the further investigation. Even voted against the submission of documents justice Clarence Thomas said that he fully agreed with the principle, and vote against, because he believes this case is an attempt to put pressure on the President.
“the Subpoena imposes on the President as time limits and psychological burden, even if the President is not directly involved in its implementation. This understanding of the presidency should serve as a guide for the courts when deciding on the enforcement of a subpoena”, – explained his decision judge Thomas. That is, he does not agree with by the provision of a document, and the lack of justification for the charges for this.
However, some secondary motivation. More important is that this decision does not mean that tomorrow all the editorials of Newspapers will be detailed estimates of the expenses of trump.
By law, the Prosecutor has no right to publish information as the investigation progresses, however, as we know, no one is immune from leaks, especially when such a sexy documents with a Republican President gets to the Prosecutor-Democrat. But this leak should not expect in the near future – the Supreme court’s decision doesn’t mean instant transmission of documents.
According to the court, the case will be sent to a retrial in the subordinate bodies where lawyers trump can provide new arguments to defend the position of the President – and they will do it. Considering the cases, not the fact that the documentation is, in principle, will be in the hands of the investigation before the election.
in addition to the solution to provide the result of economic reports trump, the Supreme court decided to reject the same request from the U.S. house of representatives.
In this issue: conservative judge sustained the position of President and thwarted an attempt by Democrats of Congress to conduct its own investigation. Thus, a new attempt of impeachment, at least, postponed.
In General, there was a stalemate – the Supreme court allowed the Democrats again to run the car of crime investigation of trump. At the same time, the judge did not make an exception for the us President – he will be obliged to submit their financial reports to the Prosecutor’s office. However, these reports are “late” for the elections that will seriously help the President. Although in case of victory he will have to face the information that you will find Cyrus Vance Jr..
