a Story about a fatal accident with the participation of Mikhail Efremov’s coming to judgment. Date not yet determined. Well, it is already clear, long pull will not. The victims and the accused got acquainted with the case materials.
Why the amount of compensation victims can grow on what conditions the lawyer Efremova offered to negotiate with the other side, are there any comments from the victims to the investigation – told the “MK” head of the human rights of the company “Result” Sergey Averchev, which represents the interests of the son of the deceased, Vitaly Zakharov.
what in the case of four victims, all of them members of the same family – this is a normal story? Why one man couldn’t imagine an entire family?
– Where did the opinion that if the case involved one family, there should be one victim? – started the conversation Sergey Aversev. – Any person who has undergone this situation can become victims if they wish. There is no such thing as a one family, then one victim. It is an ordinary situation that claimed several victims. Nothing out of the ordinary.
But just for this reason it became an issue. First brother of the deceased declared himself the victim, should join the official wife and son. The latest in the case came the eldest son.
– as for the hype, I can say one thing – therefore, forming public opinion, by the way, quite successfully and with a purpose. But I have to say, the hype is artificially inflated and not entirely true. Let me explain again about the four victims – very rarely, when the family represented one victim. It would seem strange. And could play into the hands of the accused. The family is of no use, this situation could not bring.
– Because one victim entitled to less compensation than four?
– the amount of compensation from this little depends, each case is considered individually. Even if the case included one victim, in any case, the person would represent the interests of the whole family. Understand, the deceased had several children, so victims should be several. Here at Vitaliy killed the father, Margaret – the husband, why some of them have to say, like, okay, let someone one stands for me in judgment, I do not undergo? Therefore, every member of the family the right to claim that he has suffered and must protect their interests. Here the matter concerns not only compensation, but in principle their interests.
– Your client has already determined the amount of moral harm?
– today, the specific amount yet.
approximate amounts have not yet identified?
– No, at least for the reason that, to my great surprise, the party accused for unknown reasons continues to inflict ��oral harm to victims. This occurs for the first time in my practice.
How harm?
– you Can read a number of statements published in the media, there is a video interview text carriers, where a representative of Mr. Ephraim extremely offensive speaks about the victims.
You mean statements like “soon the whole village will be asked to recognize themselves as victims”?
– And that’s absolutely true. You can’t talk about people who have lost a loved one? My client’s father died. I think it does it not reflect? And how can you talk about the son of the deceased – “the whole village”?
– That is, the more hard-hitting statements coming from the mouth of lawyer Ephraim to the victims, the increased the amount of compensation?
– the larger the size of the caused moral damage, of course.
Approximate amounts at the moment can sound? The actor’s lawyer Pashayev called about 40 million rubles.
– Pashayev, apparently aware of my thoughts better than I know myself.
– do You cooperate with the protector of the other family members?
– I Have a lawyer other family members held a short conversation on the phone. I’m sure we can be useful to each other. But at this stage this is not necessary. We have no confrontation, but the close interaction is missing. If it is for some purposes necessary, I am sure, we will provide the interaction.
– Why is the eldest son of the deceased Vitaly turned to you, not the lawyer, who protects his family?
– Why the whole family went to a lawyer, you need to ask the entire family. Vitaly turned to our company because it did not consider this choice is the most correct. Each chooses a representative for his inner convictions and opinions.
is it True that Vitaly the difficult financial situation of all the victims?
– About the personal life of Vitaly incorrect to spread from my side. As for the worst or the best financial situation, about other family members I know nothing. This point does not affect our situation.
the deceased has a civil wife Irina, who lived with the world for over 20 years. A woman has the right to become victim. During the investigation, this matter was discussed? Vitaliy has stated this to the investigator.
– said Vitaly investigator, I have no right to spread.. what is between Irina and the lost was their relationship, Vitaly told me, from his words, he refuses. Whether the right of a woman to be the victim, to determine the result. If you are interested in my personal opinion, I think she has the moral right to announce their participation in the case.
Vitaliy communicates with his grandmother, Mat��style of the deceased?
– Vitaly communicates with his grandmother. I would say more, the well-being of the grandmother is an important issue not only in this business but also in life. It is my observation. Vitaly was very worried about grandma.
Side Ephraim contacted you?
– Yes, Mr. Pasha called me, invited to come to visit him. I offered to meet in our territory. He refused for unknown reasons. No specific proposals and abstracts from Pashayeva has not sounded.
– That is, he called and said, come to me and everything?
He said, let you come to me. I said better you to us. We are located in Ryazan. Pashayev refused and explained that he had no time to meet with me, offered to collect preferably all the victims, since he can’t spend time on each of them. Then he added that in extreme cases, agree to come to Vitaly in Ryazan, but to meet with his representative refused. As a result, wished me success.
what discussion?
– in my practice the first time I see such behaviour of the accused and their representatives. People tend to behave differently.
don’t You think that the lawyer Efremova playing some game?
– of Course on the side the game is played. They talk about it openly. I heard the same Mr. Pashayev one compared the situation with penalty kicks, which is amazing. People were killed, is somehow not very similar to the game. I do not entirely know the game scenario. There are a number of assumptions, but to make them unethical.
What position your client in relation to Ephraim? He intends to seek the maximum penalty or have options to mitigate the circumstances?
– To date, the prosecution takes the position where there are no mitigating circumstances. I also don’t see any mitigating circumstances. There is only aggravating. Maybe in the process opens new circumstances, while this is not known.
Approximate court date is known?
not Yet.
– are You acquainted with the case materials?
– Repeatedly.
any comments?
– I can’t talk about it. I will say this, there are some issues. But I’m sure the answers we receive during the trial.
– Pashayev says he has proof of innocence Ephraim. In the case there’s something about it?
– Nothing like I found. In our practice, can tell if a person is not guilty he has nothing to hide. He openly says I’m not guilty and gives the facts. And the Pasha goes, hiding the cause of the innocent Ephraim: I’m not guilty, but for some reason will not say. It’s back to the question about the games.
– In the case is interrogation of Ephraim. He pleaded guilty?
– About what is written in material�� matters not subject to disclosure. Can you comment on what is known to the General public through the media. Efremov took the right position, good, confident: I don’t remember anything, so I can not admit guilt.
Read also: “the media found out about the part time wife of Ephraim after his arrest,”
