https://cdnimg.rg.ru/img/content/192/19/69/RIAN_6280448.HR.ru_d_850.jpg

is it True that the job of the exam may differ from the demos? If they can go beyond the school curriculum? On these issues, “the Russian newspaper” said the expert exam, the Chairman of the Association of teachers of Russian language and literature Moscow Roman Doschinsky.

Never the developers of the exam was not to make tasks too complex, such that they go beyond the school curriculum. Believe me, it would be evident to all the experts and became the subject of considerable discussion. In all the years I never of the exam in Russian language or literature not seen jobs that could be called “high school”. Yes, the tasks themselves can be formulated as standard, Yes, somewhere, may have to break down. And not all kids will write on 100 points. But it’s normal exam and is designed to divide graduates by level of training. But in any case the material will be the school.

the Problem is that many graduates and even tutoring focus only on demos and published options for the early period. Believe that they will fall for such tasks, and no other options can not be. But it – only versions, is just one example of how this can look such a task. One of the many options! A complete and very specific list of what knowledge and skills checks for a particular task, given the codifier of the exam and the specifications for the current academic year. The two documents along with demos are published at the beginning of each school year. All teachers well know about them. On them together you need to focus while preparing for the exam.

I am convinced that in any of the exam should be an element of “surprise”. Otherwise the exam will not perform its function, to determine which student is better prepared, and some worse. If everything is known in advance, preparation for the exam will be reduced to coaching on specific algorithms and not to test real knowledge and skills to apply them. For example, take the Russian language. In the specification could be written: the task checks this orfogramm. But test it on different linguistic material in different words. On household, and it is more complicated and rare in the use. In the second case, the graduate will have to think and decide: whether the word is accented, or is there a root alternation, or the word in the dictionary. And every year these words may be different.

this year, for example, on the exam on the Russian language, according to the graduates, they got a new for them the word “realize”, it was not before in the demos, and collections training. But if the guys worked out is fundamentally the skill of the selection of cognate words, they with this task can handle easily.

In Moscow, the teachers themselves pass the exam. And even teachers don’t always gain 100 points��V. for example, I recently received 98 points in my essay and I found one logical error. Understand that probably in a hurry, missed. But we need calmly to accept it. Both teachers and graduates.