In the Butyrsky district court in Moscow on August 17 trial begins around historical and cultural examination of the construction in the Ivanovo area of the historic roller coaster, which is called “one of the seven hills of Moscow”. The plans for the construction of a business centre surrounded by houses of the XVII century and several monuments caused a scandal in the “Arhnadzor” talking about the alleged impending “large-scale demolition of” historic mansions. AB Development here blows the building to the year 1939, but the authors claim indicate that the entire quarter is included in the joint security area, where to build almost anything, especially with the excess of the available dimensions, like the current project. The developer counters that we are talking about allowed by the law of regeneration of the building. The Department of cultural heritage assured that the area of the business centre will grow due to the development of the yard and increase the loft, and the construction will not harm the neighboring monuments.The subject of the proceedings in court was the act of the state historical-cultural examination (GICA) associated with the construction of an office building in Kolpachny lane surrounded by eight cultural heritage sites, including the chambers of the clerk of ukraintseva of the XVII century, urban estate Jurgenson 1912 and houses the servants the Moscow archive of Ministry of foreign Affairs of 1808. In may 2020 AB Development company has announced its intention to build an office complex on 7 thousand square meters near the HOMESTEAD Jurgenson, investing $15 million In the act of HIKE said that the project is a five-storey building with two underground floors, which will be built by “reconstruction of the existing non-residential buildings” with the dismantling of the latter to the Foundation. We are talking about a four-storey Institute of sociology to the year 1939 in the back of the quarter. In the act of HIKE signed by the restorer Elena Nikolaeva and approved in November 2019 by the Department of cultural heritage, is given a positive conclusion on the project and a conclusion about the safety of the neighboring monuments. Meanwhile, in the “Arhnadzor” in August 2020, stated “unprecedented invasion” in the Ivanovo hill as one of the most valuable according to the degree of preservation of the buildings in the old districts of the city and the alleged impending large-scale demolition of a series of mansions of the XIX–XX centuries.A lawsuit challenging the act of GICA filed in the Butyrskiy district court of Moscow to Moscow’s Department in June 2020, on the large-scale demolition of the monument it doesn’t say. The plaintiff, a citizen Zakrevsky, points to other violations. So, the lawsuit cited data from the examination report on that part of the site of construction located on the territory of both chambers of the clerk of ukraintseva of the seventeenth century, but it is emphasized that in such areas of article 5.1 of the law “On objects of cultural heritage of the peoples of the Russian Federation” directly prohibits capital construction, including an increase in “spatial characteristics” telegram��x existing buildings. The entire plot and not just part of it is included in the combined area of the protection of monuments of history and culture No. 69, approved by decree of the government of Moscow. In such zones, the only possible construction, “aimed at the preservation and regeneration istoriko-the cultural environment,” according to the lawsuit. The plaintiff appeals to increase the size of the building, indicating that the construction of 1939 is 4.4 thousand sq m, and the planned area of the business centre — almost 7.2 thousand sq. m: “Construction cannot be justified by the objectives of the restoration and rebuilding of the lost elements, as previously on the site of the buildings like square didn’t exist.” Finally, Mrs Zakrevsky fears of the collapse of neighbouring houses, claiming that the act of HIKE “analyzed the risk of impacts” on them.Note, at the request of the plaintiff the court as interim measures already suspended the act of examination. This motion, however, was challenged in court by the developer and the Department of cultural heritage.The Department of cultural heritage assured that the “one monument” on Ivanovo hill is not in danger. The Agency called the building a 1939 model and in “poor condition,” emphasizing that the monument it is not. Increasing the area of the structure in the office associated with the construction yard, underground floors and superstructure of the attic. AB in Development pay attention to the difference in methodology of calculations, saying that the area of the Institute (4,4 thousand sq. m) obtained by the measurements of BTI, business center (almost 7.2 thousand sq. m.) calculated the dimensions of the external walls, and the last figure on 15-20% more. The difference in the squares of the developer also explains the arrangement of the attic, not included in the measurements of BTI, underground Parking and narrower walls of the monolithic buildings, emphasizing that the construction will not be allowed for the city heights 24 m. the company added that work on the territory of the chambers clerk ukraintseva there will be no referring to the Moscow government resolution No. 523 of June 2010, which borders the protected area of the chambers are outside of the plot.In AB Development was given to understand (with reference to the experience of the reconstruction of such objects as “Fabrika Stanislavskogo” and “Bolshevik”) that the building in Kolpachny lane will be demolished due to poor condition. “The integrity of buildings objects of cultural heritage not threatened,”— said the company. Note that in the act of HIKE appears the eight-metre pit under construction, but it is mentioned and geotechnical conclusion of Gersevanov NIIOSP name. On his 26-foot zone of influence of construction on surrounding buildings fall manor Jurgenson and house archive of Ministry of foreign Affairs of the strains they offered to protect additional RAspores of the pit and geotechnical screens.The Department of cultural heritage to the question “Kommersant” about whether it is possible in the joint security area of such building, said they agreed on all the documentation is legal, “any work in the area” will not harm the monuments and it is “confirmed by experienced experts.” In AB Development recalled that in such zones, permitted regeneration, assuring that such work is envisaged in the project.Alexander Voronov
