Former Advisor to Donald trump on national security John Bolton is one of the most notorious figures in American politics. This man has always been the image of the inveterate hawk. When trump made him his adviser, a seriously frightened at the prospect of deteriorating international relations: Bolton stood for the most rigid approach in relation to countries which, in his opinion, was part of the “axis of evil”. However, a year after the appointment of the adviser were dismissed. Then, he strangely refused to participate in the impeachment trump. The reasons for the decision remained unclear – until this week.
Long after his retirement Advisor to trump John Bolton was silent. Not that this was something extraordinary in American politics is considered improper to bring to the public discussion that occurred behind closed doors.
Bolton frankly admitted that he wrote the book, and mysteriously promised that this book will shed light on many of the events that took place directly in the White house, but for some time he removed himself from any discussions of the activities of the trump, and even spoke at the impeachment hearings.
the Reasons for this ambiguous position became clear only now – when the book was finally written, and the author came on a one-hour interview to TV channel ABC News.
Just three days ago, June 20 Bolton received final approval from the court to the publication of his book and launched a campaign for its promotion. For a start, he sent a copy to journalists of leading mass media.
From them the world learned that the alleged trump asked the Chinese leader XI Jinping to help in the re-election, and also tried to understand whether Finland is part of Russia.
These “revelations” by default, cannot be definitely proved or disproved, but they certainly cause a scandal, which was made John Bolton. In the Wake of this scandal, he was invited for a long interview, which was shown in Prime time on one of the largest TV channels of America.
So what are sensational said Jon Bolton American journalists? In the end, nothing – all the most scandalous and already described in his book that the journalists received last week.
Interview with Bolton was more of a review, he shared their impressions, memories and thoughts. In General, the interview focused on the ordinary American who does not follow politics constantly.
However, among the stories of “monstrous incompetence” of Donald trump and appeals “to make the right choice in 2020” was a very interesting point. John Bolton asked why with such a huge baggage in��morning, he flatly refused to participate in the impeachment process.
Leading rightly observed that the testimony of John Bolton, could cause the bombshell – but he chose not to strike at the Tramp then.
Former Advisor to trump, said that his words “would have no value, because everything was already decided on Capitol hill.” Bolton criticized the organizers of the impeachment, saying that the process of removal of the President of the United States was a purely party, and it doomed it to failure from the outset. John Bolton said that instead of an objective investigation, he saw political action, and he “is not obliged to help the Democrats solve their own problems.”
however, the former adviser was confident that the President trump really deserves ouster, however, we need an honest investigation. In that process, which happened last fall, the words of former national security adviser would have just got lost and did not bring the desired effect – I am sure the Bolton.
of Course, it’s true. Then all the witnesses were divided into two groups – those who unequivocally supported the impeachment, and those who refused to participate.
Opinions and both were purely partisan, and they were seen more as political statement than as a legal evidence.
the words of John Bolton that trump is guilty of all mortal sins, too, would be perceived as part of the party of opposition, and former Advisor would not have received the special attention of the press.
But it’s not the only reason why Bolton decided to evade appearance at the impeachment hearings.
the fact that all the evidence in this case, it is necessary to give under oath. Lies under oath – a crime for which in the USA can easily go to jail.
Therefore, most of the witnesses were not told about the crimes of the President, but about their own guesswork and suspicions. John Bolton or risked to lose all its mysterious information, admitting that the direct evidence he is not there, or not go to jail if he’d started to invent non-existent sins of the President.
In this situation, the position of John Bolton seems the most sensible. He was not substituted during the impeachment, but then he did everything to tell their secrets to the world.
the book is not required documentary precision, there is no risk to go to jail, and the fee you can get a good in a good hands. In short, for ex-adviser Bolton’s decision to publish a book now is very wise, here only the contents of this book can hardly be taken as an absolute truth.
