https://cdnimg.rg.ru/img/content/188/57/82/iStock-1091595146_d_850.jpg

Today, the Plenum of the Supreme court of Russia considered the draft resolution explaining the procedure of consideration of administrative cases: where it is a dispute between citizens and the government. For example, under a special procedure prescribed in the Code of administrative procedure, discusses the disputes with tax authorities or bailiffs.

the Law provides for mandatory audioproduction trial. This means that the meeting should be recorded continuously from the beginning to the end. “Courts of appeal must take into account that the record of the hearing, in writing and containing all the information required by part 3 of article 205 of the RF cap, could not replace audioproduction management is necessarily, therefore, in violation of procedural regulations on continuous maintenance of audioproduction the court hearing, the trial court’s decision is subject to unconditional cancellation”, says the draft resolution of the Plenum.

“by Itself, the audio recording of hearings by parties and their representatives is a pretty old practice, – said “RG” lawyer Bureau “Sikaylo, Romakhova and partini” Alexey Sikaylo. – Courts of record of the meetings had begun fairly recently, if you talk about arbitration courts and courts of General jurisdiction of first level”.

by the Way, arbitration courts have begun to provide the opportunity to listen to audioprojektai trial online.

“At the moment access to the materials and protocols available only to the parties and their representatives, – says Alexey Sikaylo. – You must register, either through the IAIS to log in my.arbitr.ru then to submit a petition. The judge, usually in the presence of the powers of the applicant, coordinates the provision of access to materials and protocols.”

According to him, the placement of materials of court cases in electronic form, including access audioprogram, of course, facilitates the work of the parties and their representatives in the process. “Especially if the matter is considered by the court, which is remote from the location of the hand region”, – concluded the expert.