on 17 July, the day after the exam in chemistry, the social network blew a flurry of accusations of this final testing in excessive complexity and as a consequence demands to annul the results. As a result, in the virtual space have been two petitions with these requirements, and two conflicting versions of the unified state examination in chemistry of the Krasnoyarsk teacher-himichka Olga Yumasheva.
the First society was the information on how the exam in chemistry was handed the teacher of the subject of school №32 of the city of Krasnoyarsk Olga Yumasheva. This message aroused in readers a shock. Twice. For the first time — when it became clear that because of Supermagnete questions Pragmatica-himichka not really mastered even the lightest of the first part of the studies on the subject, which she teaches to children. Second — when there was a different version of the same interview Yumasheva — with assurances that she decided all tasks, and the majority of them, in her estimation, anyone not too lazy to graduate.
However, compare themselves and feel what is called the difference:
Option 1. “the Poor children! There are jobs that I did the first time seen. I logically wrote something, but I don’t know how it right! The first part was written well, but the second part is very podoviridae, a lot of pitfalls,” said the teacher. But at the same time “admitted that the time is hardly enough for fulfilling all the tasks, but their test failed”.
Option 2. “the Job I have no problems called, the first part is very easy and straightforward, but on the second it is already necessary to think well. To write the exam for high scores, enough to have a school knowledge on the subject, but not superficial, and deep.
you Need to regularly revise material, to solve the problem. Time was enough for me to do all the work, but I sat until the very end, and double-checked the already solved tasks. I think that they will receive for their work not less than 85 points. But scores for me is not important. Now it will be much easier to support their students. Moreover, they already know I wrote the exam in chemistry. By the way, guys, my action was met with great enthusiasm and strongly supported me”.
Meanwhile, in social networks there are several competing petitions with the requirement to recognize invalid results of the exam on chemistry in force hitherto unseen complexity in their jobs. And although all petitions are different, their essence is one.
the Author of one, for example, demands to cancel the results of the exam, because “today’s work is not consistent with the level of jobs with FIPI, demos and early versions. The disciples prepared themselves the whole year to ensure that FIPI posted on the official website, and got the other.” Another says that “the exam tasks on chemistry is designed for professionals chemists. In order to successfully pass the exam in chemistry is not enough to know perfectly well the school curriculum. It is necessary to know not only by hearsay, high school textbooks. So to claim that the exam tasks in chemistry designed for the average student – hypocrisy.” The third is convinced that “the job was three to four times harder than it was possible to work on the sites”.
Along the way, the compilers job got charged that “apparently went in the course of the task prepared before the pandemic, no adjustment was not carried out” (although from the beginning it was said that no adjustments jobs, and lowering passing scores to universities, will not). And all this — in order to undo the results of the exam in chemistry and hold a new exam. Much easier.
Alas, to achieve this goal, it seems, will not succeed. In the Ministry of education said that such statements are “interested persons” occur annually and are not a basis to review the results of the unified state examinations. In short, will not be repeating.
