https://im.kommersant.ru/Issues.photo/CORP/2020/07/08/KMO_176340_00008_1_t218_115914.jpg

“Nornikel” did not agree with the record size of the fine in 147,7 billion rubles, which were issued to the company Rosprirodnadzor for spilling fuel at Norilsk. The company drew attention to the use of Rosprirodnadzor maximum of the coefficients of damage that usually used for those who were not engaged in elimination of the accident. In this case, the MMC immediately started to liquidate. The company States that it remains ready to reverse the effects of the spill at his own expense.”Nornikel” does not agree with the method of calculating damage to the environment, which was used Rosprirodnadzor in the calculation of the amount of damages for the accident spill of fuel at TPP-3 under the Norilsk may 29. The company reported that it had sent to the service corresponding letter. MMC believes that the calculations were based on the principles that have led to a distortion of the result. The evaluation of RPN, the accident caused damage to 147.7 billion rubles., and “Norilsk Nickel” already offered it voluntarily to cover. The Minister of natural resources Dmitry Kobylkin called the fine amount corresponding to the damage to the ecology of the Arctic.Read next calculations, the company used the maximum factor 5 that takes into account the duration of negative impact of pollutants on the water body not taking measures for its elimination. In the current enforcement practice such a ratio is in nature and the penalty applies when the perpetrator of the accident did nothing to eliminate or long did not use any measures. In the “Norilsk Nickel” to emphasize that the company the liquidation of the accident began immediately, so the use factor is unreasonable.In the “Norilsk Nickel” also believe that the argument of Rosprirodnadzor on the need to use the maximum coefficient for cases of water pollution with oil products due to their solubility refuted by the judicial practice, since diesel fuel is not soluble pollutant. In addition, Rosprirodnadzor, according to MMC, incorrectly calculated the mass of oil trapped in reservoirs. The fact that the amount of water-fuel mixture, contaminated soil and sorbent collected in the CHP-3, designed to completion of works on skimming oil in the area.To read next the official statement, the company confirmed its obligation to compensate for harm in full volume and to restore the ecosystem in the area of the accident. Recent measurements of Rosprirodnadzor show achievement background values maximum allowable concentration of pollutants in water bodies. Such work can be organized in the framework of the interdepartmental Commission created by the Ministry of natural resources, or in a specially created working group.Dmitry Kobylkin commented on MMC. At to him, the damage to the environment and liquidation of consequences of the accident two disparate concepts. “If the company can prove in court that she is innocent, she has that right. We have seen the consequences of the accident officially recorded indicators of the damage Rosprirodnadzor estimated the damage,” he said. Managing partner of law Bureau “Bartolius” Julius Tay stressed that he does not agree with the calculations does not mean denial of the facts of the contamination and the need for compensation. “In practice, the service goes to a meeting and adjusts the calculations if they were errors. If the service is based on the principled position that the calculations are correct, then the problem is solved in a judicial order”,— says the expert. Mr Tay drew attention to the decision of Plenum of the Supreme court from 2017, where, in particular, stated that the purpose of redress is ecological restoration, not punishment of the person who caused the harm. Questions of punishment are addressed within other branches of law and other state bodies. Eugene Zainullin