https://im.kommersant.ru/Issues.photo/DAILY/2020/117/KMO_175047_00060_2_t218_220244.jpg

Over the next year, some of the decisions of the organs of control and supervision can be appealed informally by remotely — the government intends to give the opportunity to entrepreneurs to run disputes through the portal. While in the experiment will involve the emergencies Ministry, Rostekhnadzor and Roszdravnadzor. For business new procedure may reduce the time and financial costs for vessels to reduce the load on the model cases, for the state apparatus, she can be a filter to detect potentially serious and unusual problems and the ability to reallocate resources and legal departments of the agencies.The white house is preparing an experiment on pre-trial appeal against decisions of government agencies. As follows from the draft government resolution, posted on 6 July, the Ministry of economy, it is necessary to introduce in the work of control bodies of pre-trial practice to appeal in the framework of the reform of control and supervision. According to the instructions of Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Grigorenko, the project must be submitted to the White house by the end of this week. It is expected that the experiment will take place from 10 July 2020 to 30 June 2021 and August will be participating in it the emergencies Ministry, Rostekhnadzor and Roszdravnadzor.Now entrepreneurs can appeal decisions of the controllers as directed in the court order or administrative (in the second case, the complaint is sent to the Agency). However, it is noted in the explanatory note to the draft, “procedures for the implementation of pre-judicial appeal as an independent institution is not installed”.While the load on the court system in part of the analysis, disputes with supervisors is great — even in 2016 is an opportunity in court to challenge the user and letters, for example, Antimonopoly and customs services, which, though indirectly, but become mandatory for citizens and legal entities. we Note that the proposed now as an experiment, Institute pre-trial appeal of decisions has long worked in the tax field — FNS at the time he made the mandatory order of this kind of settlement for the acts of an offensive nature. It obviously concerns the dissemination of command Prime Minister Mikhail mishustina this practice in all Supervisory activities.In the experiment, the Ministry of economy intends to automate the procedure: complaints will be lodged directly to state agencies via the state services portal. A similar opportunity now exists outside of the tax sphere, however, is mainly linked to the provision of public services to citizens such as payment of benefits or enrollment of children in preschool.The new procedure will be launched in the areas of fire inspection, quality control and safety of medical care, handling of medicines and medical products, as well as in the field ��industrial security, and energy supervision and safety of hydraulic structures. A complaint through the website services can be submitted in case of disagreement with the decisions on the appointment of scheduled or unscheduled inspections, with the requirements to eliminate violations and take measures to prevent harm or the cessation thereof (e.g., opinion dangerous to the health of products or temporary ban on activity).Under the project, the state Agency shall within two working days to make a decision: to suspend the contested action or to deny it. In the end, the Comptroller may cancel the decision completely or partially — with the ability to accept new things. According to the Ministry of economy, this procedure will allow you to reduce costs in judicial proceedings (at least on the size of the state duty, which in pre-trial proceedings), and will also give the government a tool for the analysis of law enforcement practice and its unification.Head of Expert centre at the KND of “Business Russia” Rinat Gizatulin believes that the experiment will contribute to enhance the transparency of the procedure of appeal against decisions of inspectors. Vice-President “Support of Russia” Marina bludyan notes that “litigation is costly in time and finances and most importantly — productive.” In its opinion, the court should be the last resort, “because in most cases it is a matter of principle for the duration of the process.” Pre-trial mechanisms, says Mrs. bloden, will allow us to solve problems.Note that for the state apparatus pre-trial settlement, as demonstrated by the practice of FNS, has virtually no drawbacks. On the one hand, this system is a kind of primary filter is a stream of complaints, when an organ of control and supervision has the opportunity at an early stage to identify potentially serious (from the point of view of future costs, the reputation of the government, the possible detection of corruption situations) and non-standard problems in the flow of ordinary. On the other hand, the system allows you to radically redistribute resources and legal departments of the agencies. For the judicial system “primary filter” is a significant load reduction on standard cases. For entrepreneurs, the system of pre-trial settlement of claims is lengthening of limited duration (unlike the courts, this system works with fixed-term claims) the possibility of filing judicial complaints. In addition, it is, in fact, free examination of judicial prospects against the decision — as practice shows, much of the future claims are identified at this stage. The losers from the implementation of the system and a party to some extent are legal consultants and companies: the amount of PRAchicosci guaranteed demand for their services will decrease.Evgenia Kryuchkova, Diana Galieva, Dmitry Butrin