In the case of the wireless In-Ear Headphones, there was no real competition for Apple. The Airpods were about to hit the battery life hard to – and with 179 Swiss francs, compared to other types of earplugs without cord is still quite cheap. Now Sony, Apple wants to make the throne. Not with complicated names, but maybe the WF-1000 XM3 can outclass the Airpods in other areas.

The “Ohrstäbchen” of Apple were ridiculed at the beginning. Today, we are getting used to the sight, it’s even become a trademark. Sony’s Design is different, something discrete, but not necessarily beautiful. But The newcomer is larger and heavier. The Case is, for example, is twice as powerful, which brings the Airpods in this area of the point. the Airpods vs. WF-1000 XM3 1:0

As headphones to wear, is totally subjective and for each Person different. Especially when you have to push the earpiece into your ear. In the VIEW-Test, the Airpods over a longer period of time were significantly more comfortable. Apple has managed to find a shape that fits many users very well. The Sony In-Ear considered to be better in the ear – in addition, you get four different towers to the listener to adapt to the ear canal. A draw in a duel. the Airpods vs. WF-1000 XM 3 2:1

The Sony headphones hold 50 percent longer

The Airpods pair almost like of yourself with the iPhone, in Android, the arduous is. Conversely, it is in the Sony. But thanks to the App has the XM3 on both operating systems full functionality. In addition, you can adjust the handset directly, much more, about the Noise Cancelling is switched on. However, adjusted in the case of Sony around the ear are also much more Equipped, because in addition to the touch area only little space for the handset to handle. A pity: The volume can be started in two models only at the Smartphone, or voice control. Overall, a draw, Sony can be more annoying but also more. the Airpods vs. WF-1000 XM3 3:2

The Airpods for about five hours before you have to download. Sony offers six hours without noise cancellation even eight hours. The Test shows that all these values are quite realistic. With the very important term Sony compensates. the Airpods vs. WF-1000 XM3 3:3

Here, the clear winner of the Sony name. Because the Airpods tones, overall only good, the WF-1000XM3 very well. Especially in the case of the bass, Sony has the nose in front. The sound is still clear and balanced, and he can, with a few clicks in the App to your own needs. the Airpods vs. WF-1000 XM3 3:4

The Airpods are Apple-atypical cheap

The Airpods costs 179 Swiss francs, with wireless charging case 229 francs. In the case of Sony, you do not need to pay for 249 Swiss francs, wireless Charging is possible. Apple wins so clear in this area and compensates. the Airpods vs. WF-1000 XM3 4:4

canceling : Since Apple does not offer this feature at all, the last point to Sony. This is because the WF-100 XM3 have a built-in noise cancellation, which can be about 20 levels. Noise Cancelling only works really well if the plugs are rich and “deep” in the ear. Then about 70 to 80 percent of the outside noise will be filtered out, but still considerably less than Over-Ear models. the Airpods vs. WF-1000 XM3 4:5

just the Sony headphones wins the duel against the model of Apple. It is clear that You have to try both yourself. Because the Airpods not, for example, then you can customize anything. In the case of Sony, the same applies, in addition to the WF-1000 XM3 can play to its Strengths, only if you sit perfectly. Overall, the Airpods are a cheaper, simpler and more straightforward solution, especially for iPhone Users. Sony impresses with sound quality, battery life and noise cancellation, what it is headphones with In-Ear head rarely is.